Content protection news, October 2026: blocking and voice rights
By
Ceartas Team
October 2026 was the month site blocking showed its limits, the law moved closer to treating your voice and face as yours, and AI imitation kept growing in volume. Courts in Paris and Madrid, two rival US bills and a Spanish football league's filing all pointed the same way: blocking moves the route to pirated material, not the material itself. A Tokyo court and a Danish bill took on voice and likeness. A major record label put a number on how many AI tracks imitate its artists. Late in the month, a supplier of pirate video players shut down, the FTC had nineteen clones of itself removed, and UK police put a figure on AI endorsement fraud. This roundup covers the stories our weekly radar picked up from 29 September to 2 November.
Copyright enforcement and site blocking
A report on 3 October 2026 said that the US Congress now has two competing site blocking bills, the American Copyright Protection Act (H.R. 10364) and the DEFEND IP Act (S. 5529 and H.R. 10575). They differ on whether VPNs can be ordered to block. Both are introduced bills, not law, and neither has passed. Read our analysis: new US site blocking bills. More in our piracy enforcement tracker.
On 8 October 2026 a report covered a ruling dated 17 September by the Paris Judicial Court, which refused a French pay TV broadcaster's request for daily penalties against a CDN and DNS provider over pirate sport streaming sites. The court read EU case law as requiring reasonable measures rather than guaranteed results. The provider is not a wrongdoer here, and the broadcaster can still appeal. Chasing each new mirror falls back on the rights holder. Read our analysis: reasonable, not effective. More in our piracy enforcement tracker.
On 28 September 2026 a Madrid court approved anti piracy measures, including search delisting and blocking by internet providers, against a pirate streaming portal that drew about two million visits a month, according to Spain's Intellectual Property Commission. The domain stopped resolving shortly after, but within days the site's channels on a messaging app and a chat platform had moved to a new name and a similar site appeared, according to a report on 9 October 2026. This is administrative and civil enforcement: nobody has been arrested or charged, and it is not established that the order covers the new site. More in our piracy enforcement tracker.
On 20 October 2026 a US magistrate judge ordered a major social media company to identify the people who took part in or approved its decisions to download pirated book archives by BitTorrent, in a case brought by a business magazine publisher, according to a report. It is a discovery order in live litigation, and the company has not been found liable. A dated record of who took what and when is what courts ask for. Read our analysis: why your records matter. More in our piracy enforcement tracker.
Vietnamese prosecutors have indicted seven people alleged to have run a large anime piracy site and related sites, according to a report on 30 October 2026. The indictment says the group received 12.85 million in a dollar pegged stablecoin in advertising revenue through one ad network. Nothing has been tried, nobody has been convicted, and the sites had already shut in March 2026. More in our piracy enforcement tracker.
Live sports and IPTV piracy
Spain's top football league has nominated four major VPN providers for the European Commission's 2027 Counterfeit and Piracy Watch List, according to a report on 30 September 2026. Its complaint is about affiliate marketing that promotes VPNs as a way round court ordered blocks. It is a nomination, not a finding: nothing has been decided, watch list inclusion carries no legal effect, and none of the four companies has been found to have done anything unlawful. For a league, the filing says a lot about how much years of blocking orders have actually achieved. More in our live sports piracy tracker.
In a filing to the US Trade Representative, a major social media company said it built an AI tool in 2026 that predicts whether a live stream is an unauthorised sports broadcast and removes it in real time without a rights holder asking, according to a report on 26 October 2026. The company gave no figures, no court or regulator has assessed the claim, and the tool covers only its own services. More in our live sports piracy tracker.
A service that supplied embeddable live sports video players to around 30 pirate sites, by a film studio trade body's estimate, closed with a short notice that gave no reason and pointed users to five other sites, according to a report on 27 October 2026. No police force, court or rights holder has claimed the shutdown. One supplier can serve many storefronts, and capacity moves elsewhere the same day. More in our live sports piracy tracker.
Impersonation and AI likeness
A report on 30 September 2026 said that the Tokyo District Court found a person's voice, like their portrait, symbolises individual personality, and that unauthorised commercial use of it can infringe publicity rights. A Japanese voice actor's claim over an AI clone of his voice was still dismissed, because the videos had already been deleted. It gives creators a stronger argument, not a new takedown route. Read our analysis: a Tokyo court on voice and publicity rights. More in our impersonation and AI likeness tracker.
A major record label, not the one that sued a distributor in September, told a national newspaper it has asked platforms to remove more than 260,000 AI tracks impersonating its artists by the end of September, against about 135,000 by the end of March, according to a report on 5 October 2026. Both are the label's own figures, and the reporting does not say how many tracks came down. A count of requests tells you what was found, not what stayed removed. More in our impersonation and AI likeness tracker.
On 29 October 2026 the US Federal Trade Commission said nineteen websites impersonating it were taken down after it sent warning letters to the domain registrars and other providers serving them, citing its Impersonation Rule. No charges are reported. What worked was writing to the companies keeping the sites online, a route open to any impersonated brand. Source: FTC. More in our impersonation and AI likeness tracker.
Deepfakes
On 29 September 2026 two news organisations published an investigation into what happened when three women reported sexualised deepfakes of themselves to three police forces in the UK. None of the three reports led to a prosecution: in two cases police said no suspect could be identified, and in the third the person traced was outside the UK. On 22 October 2026 the same newsroom reported that South Wales Police had reopened one of the closed cases under sexual offences law. No arrest, charge or identification has been reported. More in our deepfakes tracker.
Researchers at a US university and Lancaster University identified 88 sites actively hosting non consensual AI intimate imagery and found five dominant infrastructure providers behind them, including a CDN provider and a domain registrar, according to a report on 30 September 2026. That is infrastructure provision, not an allegation of wrongdoing. The study explains why a link removed from search can still load: the host is a separate layer. More in our deepfakes tracker.
Denmark was set to introduce a bill on 8 October 2026 amending its copyright law to ban sharing realistic deepfakes of people's faces and voices made without consent, according to a report. The country's culture minister hopes it takes effect at the start of 2027. It is a bill, not law, satire and parody are exempt, and it applies in Denmark only. Read our analysis: Denmark's bill on faces, voices and copyright. More in our deepfakes tracker.
Speaking at the IMF annual meetings in Bangkok on 14 October 2026, the Bank of England Governor said: "There's no real liability for the provision of the platform to what's on it," according to a report. Separately, in June 2026, AI generated scam adverts using his likeness circulated on a social media platform, and the Bank said they were very hard to track down and remove. The speech changes no law, and nobody has been charged or found liable. More in our deepfakes tracker.
City of London Police figures released in late October put losses to investment fraud using AI, including fake endorsements from public figures and trusted financial institutions, at £24.3 million between January and August 2026, from more than 1,300 reports, according to a report on 30 October 2026. No one is named and no arrests are reported. Fraud reports come from the people who lost money, so the person whose face was used is usually never told. More in our deepfakes tracker.
Leaked and stolen content
A leaker of an unreleased blockbuster game has tied the release of a full playable build to a cryptocurrency market cap target and is demanding a public apology from the game's publisher, according to a report on 10 October 2026. Every claim, including possession of a complete build, is unverified, and no arrests or charges have been reported. The footage is coming out in instalments, and each one needs its own removal. More in our leaked content tracker.
California has enacted Senate Bill 1247, according to a report on 29 October 2026. From January 2027, adults who appeared as children in a family member's monetised social media content can require that family member to remove it or edit them out, where they appeared in at least 30 per cent of the poster's content. It reaches the original poster, not reposts, compilations or mirrors, and it applies in California only. Read our analysis: what California's SB 1247 covers. More in our leaked content tracker.
What it means for you
Blocking moves the route, not the file. Paris, Madrid and the Spanish league's filing all leave the rights holder chasing mirrors and new names.
Removed from search is not removed. Ask whether your takedowns reach the host, where the file actually lives.
Your voice and face are getting legal recognition, slowly and locally. Tokyo gave a principle without a remedy, and Denmark's bill is not yet law.
Count what stays down, not what you sent. A request total does not tell you whether your content or likeness is still out there.
Report to police and platforms, and run removal alongside. Keep evidence of every copy you find, with links and dates.
If any of this is affecting your content or your likeness, talk to us.

